Which of the following is true about the incentives created by capitation arrangements?

Capitation arrangements involve paying healthcare providers a set fee per patient for a specified period, regardless of the number of services provided. This model incentivizes providers to manage healthcare costs effectively, as they receive a fixed payment irrespective of the services rendered.

The capability of capitation to motivate physicians to limit costs arises from its focus on preventative care and efficiency. Since physicians are financially responsible for a patient's overall care within the capitation model, they are encouraged to focus on preventive measures, efficient treatment, and alternative therapies that avoid unnecessary high-cost interventions. This ultimately aligns the providers' financial incentives with the pursuit of cost-effective care, leading to potentially better patient outcomes and lower overall healthcare expenses.

In contrast, other options suggest behaviors contrary to the nature of capitation. For instance, encouraging more referrals and expensive treatments directly contradicts the structure of capitation, as increased costs would adversely impact the provider's profitability. Similarly, disincentivizing cost-effective care contradicts the fundamental goals of capitation, which emphasizes efficiency and preventative measures. Lastly, the claim that capitation creates equal payment without performance considerations overlooks the nuance of the model, which aims to balance financial risk with the need for quality outcomes through effective resource management.